Since we've established it's a trichomonad, we've narrowed it down to this tree:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0VnI_QzoCdgXqRfsJ1pYt4uFAIVsKLAf3WpS99_TPo62Ak6Ejz6h3OkCigV8Xz4UKIv6iViONUqz0teu8UfskQfVBzYopIsONLrescvATKAeb8oxhJygZmuOqynUtgEpLJ2TNlMna7wdy/s400/Parabasalian+tree+Noda+et+al+2009+Mol+Phylogenet+Evol.jpg)
(Noda et al. 2009 Mol Phylogenet Evol; a parabasalian phylogeny. It's somewhere in there. It's even mentioned. /massive hint)
I do realise this one is even more obscure/diffucult than usual.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS