Field of Science

  • in The Biology Files
  • in The Large Picture Blog
  • in Life of a Lab Rat
  • in The Phytophactor
  • in Games with Words
  • in Disease Prone
  • in The Curious Wavefunction
  • in Skeptic Wonder
  • in History of Geology
  • in Catalogue of Organisms
  • in RRResearch
  • in A is for Aspirin
  • in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
  • in Sex, Genes & Evolution
  • in Doc Madhattan
  • in Chinleana
  • in Pleiotropy
  • in Labs
  • in The View from a Microbiologist
  • in Moss Plants and More
  • in PLEKTIX
  • in The Greenhouse
  • in Angry by Choice
  • in The Culture of Chemistry
  • in inkfish
  • in Variety of Life
  • in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
  • in The Astronomist
  • in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
  • in Field Notes
  • in Rule of 6ix
  • in C6-H12-O6

Mystery Micrograph #14

Apparently the last one was too easy, at least for our resident micropaleontologist. I'll explain it later, but before I bury myself in the bitter products of procrastination (known as work that could've been done much earlier at leisure, but instead will be done in a rush of madness right now... the story of my life, pretty much. Sigh), have another mystery micrograph to play with. These are a single genus.

To be referenced later; all scalebars = 1mm

7 comments:

  1. Hydrodictyon, perhaps? (complete guess based on no evidence whatsoever)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aydin: LOL... no they're real living organisms! =D

    Christopher: nope, hydrodicty is much finer, and also much greener.

    Keep going! Note the scalebar, btw...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm thinking that they're xenophyophores.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lana!!!1!11! Boy do I loves me some macroscopic protists...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, congrats, Neil! It definitely is Lana; didn't expect anyone to get it so quickly as Komokiaceans are quite obscure, even to protistologists.

    I also love macroscopic protists... especially when they're sort of unicellular. Too bad most of them tend to drift around in the deep sea...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well I guessed that they were Komokiaceans based on research for a blog post that I never actually published. But I have to admit that I resorted to Google Scholar to come up with the genus, fortunately the number of papers on Komokiaceans is low enough that I turned up the source of the picture in a few minutes.

    Great blog by the way, I don't know how it took me so long to find!

    ReplyDelete

Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS