Pages

Public apology to prokaryotes

Dear Domains Eubacteria and Archaea,

I have previously stated that while biochemically sophisticated, you're just lipid bags of biochemistry devoid of any worthy internal structure. Consequently, I've ignored you due to a personal aversion to biochemistry and the idea that your innards are too primitive to be of any interest to the cell biologist in me. I have been mislead to believe that having your DNA immediately enshrouded in fat* was a prerequisite to being a structurally interesting creature.

When browsing through Nature Reviews Microbiology, I came across a discussion of multicellularity and specialisation in some hyphal creature. For a split second, I thought "Wow, there's hyphal prokaryotes?!" and quickly smacked myself in the head thinking "Just because it's microbiology doesn't mean it's prokaryotic, you dumbfuck!" So I avoided the article in utter embarassment.

Today I've come across an explicit mention of a hyphal, multicellular prokaryote - Streptomyces. I could not believe it -- bacteria being confused with fungi, of all things?! And...wait...multicellular?

I soon found a few articles confirming its existence. Including that Nature review I scuttered away from...

Here it is:

(Source)


Source of image has a great overview too:
http://openwetware.org/wiki/Streptomyces:Other_Bits/An_Introduction_to_Streptomyces

I was wrong. I would hereby like to retract my prior statements about structural primitiveness of prokaryotes. Please forgive me!

Signed,
--Arrogant eukaryote


And meanwhile I gave all this hell to zoologists and botanists who would exclaim: "Oh protists -- the primitive eukaryotes!" Must...not...go off on a rant... Oh the hypocrisy...


*EDIT: Nevermind the lipid-wrapped DNA statement:
http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2007/06/planctomycetes_.html
Couldn't nature leave ANYTHING for us to 'dogmatise' over?

5 comments:

  1. Holy crap! ...except, once the shock wears off, I am not all that surprised: diversity is broad and convergence is everywhere. Now, the fact that these things have both a nucleus-like thing and a capacity to form hyphae makes me wonder if there is any connection between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 冗談だよね!冗談ですと言ってください!
    凄いだけど。僕はこのものを夢の中だけで見た。うれしい!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The nucleus-like thing is in a different group... I don't think they're together.

    Btw, what do you think of TC-S's Neomuran Hypothesis?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kaexar,

    I read that, but am too fucking lazy, tired, and busy to write back at the moment. After finals, k?

    ReplyDelete

Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS